Menu
The use of scripture as a form of social and psychological control through misdirection.
A legitimate biblical teaching (such as 1 Timothy 2:1-2 on praying for leaders) is invoked, something few Christians would question. But then this teaching is used to justify actions far beyond what the text supports: public political photo opportunities, social media declarations, and claims of divine approval.
Like a magician who directs attention to one hand while performing the trick with the other, this approach focuses on an accepted biblical command while subtly endorsing political alignment that the text never addresses.
Questioning the political aspects becomes framed as questioning scripture itself, creating confusion and silencing legitimate concerns.
This functions like a confidence scheme, where trust in something legitimate (scripture) is leveraged to gain acceptance for something that would otherwise be questioned. The audience, having accepted the biblical premise, is psychologically primed to accept conclusions, such as specific political alignments, that don’t actually follow from it.
This pattern occurs across the political spectrum and is part of what we call “Existential Narrative Colonization,” in which scripture texts are deftly redeployed to serve purposes distant from their original intent while maintaining the appearance of biblical fidelity.
Your one action step, when someone uses a biblical premise to justify a political conclusion, is to immediately ask this question: Does the Scripture being cited demand the specific action being promoted? If the answer is no, you have spotted the Sleight of Hand. Reject the conclusion, not your sacred text.
Where have you personally witnessed this “Theological Sleight of Hand” at work? Share your thoughts below.